The RGPD and the Data Protection Act 2018 introduce new elements and provide organizations with the opportunity to review their current data protection and data protection practices. The Data Protection Act 2018 defines the legitimate grounds for the handling of personal data of the particular category – even without consent, if circumstances warrant – where it is essentially in the public interest to protect children and persons at risk. Where it is established that a potentially violent person is convicted of acts of violence or if there is information about his or her behaviour that reasonably leads the police and other authorities to believe that they pose a risk of harm to their partner, disclosure is made. We intend to publish the details of our information sharing agreements if, in the meantime, you have any questions regarding the agreements we have, please contact the data protection team. Information-sharing agreements are agreements that lay the legal basis for the use of personal data by the public sector across traditional organizational boundaries to improve strategies and provide better services. Practitioners should also ensure that important information is shared about all adults with whom the child is in contact, which may affect the safety or well-being of the child. The law rightly provides guarantees for the use of personal data (data protection law, human rights and common law) and organisational costs associated with complying with these conditions. It is important that these safeguards exist and are properly applied. The Guardian has a key role to play in ensuring that the NHS, local authorities` social services and partner organisations meet the highest standards for patient management and customer-identifiable information. The exchange of data can be done in a way that helps to provide the best services we all want, while respecting people`s legitimate expectations regarding the privacy and confidentiality of their personal data. In the event of a clear risk of serious harm to a child or serious harm to adults, the decision to share information is clear, as steps must be taken to respond to disclosure. In other cases, such as negligence. B, indicators can be more subtle and appear over time.
In these cases, it is more difficult to assess what information should be shared and when. Decisions in this area must be made by persons with appropriate child protection skills, such as designated or designated practitioners or managers, or be made with the board of persons. The information exchanged should be proportionate. It is often only then that it becomes clear that a child has suffered or has likely suffered significant damage when information from a number of sources is exchanged and then compiled.
（转载本站文章请注明作者和出处 酷 壳 – CoolShell ，请勿用于任何商业用途）