In general, this new standard provides guidelines for recognition and measurement for situations where a government is the beneficiary of an irrevocable split-interest agreement. In these cases, a donor irrevocably transfers resources to an intermediary and the mediator manages these funds for the unconditional benefit of the government and at least one other beneficiary. In some situations, the government can be both an intermediary and a beneficiary, and GASB deals with each of these situations in the new standard. Split-interest agreements, also known as planned broadcasting services, are contributions that cede legal rights to certain assets to a PNFP and other beneficiaries. As a general rule, the terms of these contributions do not allow the donor to revoke the donation and are therefore considered unconditional commitments. The most common type of interest agreement is that the donor receives a fixed payment each year (often expressed as a percentage of the initial contribution), i.e. a fixed number of years or the remaining life of the donor. At the end of the inter-interest split agreement, an amount required to reduce all assets and liabilities related to the agreement to zero should be recorded in the list of activities as a change in the value of the split interest agreements. This amount should, if necessary, be considered unlimited, temporary or permanently limited.
All distributions received in advance pursuant to the terms of the agreement and available to the non-profit organization for their full use at the end of the contract should be reclassified from net assets, temporarily limited, to unlimited net assets. The wide range of tax and temporal implications associated with charitable giving has led to the creation of a large number of donation types and structures. And of course, there are a plethora of accounting implications that you need to keep in mind if you are responsible for financial reporting of your type of utility. An agreement that can be particularly demanding and therefore can be understood is the split-interest agreement. Accounting for liabilities under an irrevocable inter-institutional agreement under the NFP guide could be contrary to accounting in accordance with Artide 133 as amended, if that liability contains an embedded derivative that meets the criteria of paragraph 12 of Statement 133 that require separate accounting of that derivative or if the fair value choice is made in accordance with Statement 155. The responsibility of the NFP organization for its obligation to the donor`s donor or beneficiary under an irrevocable inter-institutional demerger agreement should be analysed to determine whether it is eligible for the waiver in paragraph 10, paragraph (c), without that responsibility being subject to the requirements of Declaration 133. If the obligation. B is exclusively related to life (i.e. dependent on the overload of an identified person, in this case payments are made only if the person is alive at the time of payment), this obligation would be eligible for the waiver provided in paragraph 10, point c). This conclusion is consistent with the guidelines of Question 4 of Statement 133 Implementation Question B25, “Deferred Variable Seniority Contracts with Other Payment Methods at the End of the Accumulation Period.” Where the responsibility of the PNP organization for the commitment of the interest-splitting organization is not likely to benefit from the waiver under paragraph 10, (c) since the agreement is not exclusively related to life, the PFNP organization must determine whether this liability meets the definition of a derivative in its entirety in paragraph 6 or whether it includes an embedded derivative instrument that could justify separate accounting referred to in paragraph 12 unless it a fair value choice is made in accordance with Statement 155.
（转载本站文章请注明作者和出处 酷 壳 – CoolShell ，请勿用于任何商业用途）